The IRony and Indirect Request comprehension test - short version (IRRI-C): development, content validity and preliminary normative data.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61989/zw093k14Keywords:
assessment, irony, indirect requests, traumatic brain injury, right hemisphere damage, normative dataAbstract
Background: Following a traumatic brain injury or right hemisphere damage, many patients have difficulty understanding non-literal language. However, tools for assessing this disorder are sorely lacking in French. The existing tests (in particular the IRonie and Indirect Request comprehension test - IRRI) also have certain limitations, including the time-consuming administration.
Objectives: The present study aims to present (1) the construction, (2) the content validity, and (3) the preliminary normative data of the short version of the Irony and Indirect Requests comprehension test (IRRI-C).
Methods: (1) To select the twelve items of each IRRI-C task, difficulty and discrimination indices, item-total score correlations, and differences in correct responses between patients and control participants were calculated from the responses of 33 brain-damaged participants and 102 control subjects to the long version (36 items) of the IRRI test. (2) The tool was then given to seven speech and language therapists and neuropsychologists, who used a questionnaire to assess the clarity and relevance of the IRRI-C in assessing the target construct. (3) Finally, the IRRI-C was administered to 121 control subjects aged between 20 and 65 years to provide preliminary normative data.
Results: (1) The twelve stimuli with the best difficulty and discrimination indices, item-total score correlations, and the greatest differences between patients and control participants were selected for each task. A PowerPoint presentation, a scoring sheet, and an introduction and scoring booklet were produced and made available to clinicians on the Internet. (2) Questionnaires on construct validity showed that the IRRI-C was highly relevant for assessing the target construct and that the introductory booklet, instructions, and scoring guide were very clear. (3) Norms stratified according to the variables of interest manipulated in the tasks (context, executive demand, and presence of markers) were calculated as percentiles.
Conclusion: The IRRI-C fills an important gap in French-language pragmatics assessment tools. Its shorter format and stratification of norms make it a tool better adapted to clinical reality and conducive to the development of diagnostic hypotheses and therapeutic goals. Future improvements, including validation in different populations and a finer-grained analysis of production during scoring, will further enhance its clinical relevance.
References
Bernier, J. J., & Pietrulewicz, B. (1997). La psychométrie. Traité de mesure appliquée. Gaétan Morin Editeur.
Bertoux, M. L. (2014). Mini SEA : Évaluation de la démence fronto-temporale. De Boeck Superieur.
Blake, M. L. (2007). Perspectives on treatment for communication deficits associated with right hemisphere brain damage. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(4), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2007/037)
Blake, M. L. (2017). Right-hemisphere pragmatic disorders. Dans L. Cummings (dir.), Research in clinical pragmatics. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology (vol 11, p. 243–266). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47489-2_10
Blake, M. L., Tompkins, C. A., Scharp, V. L., Meigh, K. M., & Wambaugh, J. (2015). Contextual constraint treatment for coarse coding deficit in adults with right hemisphere brain damage: generalisation to narrative discourse comprehension. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 25(1), 15–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2014.932290
Bosco, F. M., Parola, A., Sacco, K., Zettin, M., & Angeleri, R. (2017). Communicative-pragmatic disorders in traumatic brain injury: the role of theory of mind and executive functions. Brain and Language, 168, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.01.007
Brownell, H., Lundgren, K., Cayer-Meade, C., Nichols, M., Caddick, K., & Spitzer, J. (2007). Assessing quality of metaphor interpretation by right hemisphere damaged patients. Brain and Language, 103(1–2), 197–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.07.113
Byom, L., & Turkstra, L. S. (2017). Cognitive task demands and discourse performance after traumatic brain injury. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 52(4), 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12289
Champagne, M., Virbel, J., Nespoulous, J.-L., & Joanette, Y. (2003). Impact of right hemispheric damage on a hierarchy of complexity evidenced in young normal subjects. Brain and Cognition, 53(2), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00099-X
Champagne-Lavau, M., Cordonier, N., Bellmann, A., & Fossard, M. (2018). Context processing during irony comprehension in right-frontal brain-damaged individuals. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 32(8), 721–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2018.1430851
Champagne-Lavau, M., & Joanette, Y. (2009). Pragmatics, theory of mind and executive functions after a right-hemisphere lesion: different patterns of deficits. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22(5), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.02.002
Colston, H. L., & Gibbs Jr., R. W. (2002). Are irony and metaphor understood differently? Metaphor and Symbol, 17(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1701_5
Cordonier, N., Champagne-Lavau, M., & Fossard, M. (2022). A new test of Irony and Indirect Requests Comprehension—the IRRI test: validation and normative data in French-speaking adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 37(1), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acab043
Cordonier, N., Champagne-Lavau, M., & Fossard, M. (2023a). Improved comprehension of irony and indirect requests following a severe traumatic brain injury: two case studies. Aphasiology, 1-27. Publication anticipée en ligne. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2023.2272962
Cordonier, N., Fossard, M., & Champagne-Lavau, M. (2020). Differential impairments in irony comprehension in brain-damaged individuals: insight from contextual processing, theory of mind, and executive functions. Neuropsychology, 34(7), 750–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000682
Cordonier, N., Fossard, M., Tillé, Y., & Champagne-Lavau, M. (2023b). Exploring cognitive-pragmatic heterogeneity following acquired brain injury: a cluster analysis of hint comprehension. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 32(6), 2752-2767. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00389
Côté, H., Payer, M., Giroux, F., & Joanette, Y. (2007). Towards a description of clinical communication impairment profiles following right-hemisphere damage. Aphasiology, 21(6–8), 739–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701192331
Cummings, L. (2011). Pragmatic disorders and their social impact. Pragmatics and Society, 2(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.2.1.02cum
Dardier, V., Bernicot, J., Delanoë, A., Vanberten, M., Fayada, C., Chevignard, M., Delaye, C., Laurent-Vannier, A., & Dubois, B. (2011). Severe traumatic brain injury, frontal lesions, and social aspects of language use: a study of French-speaking adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 44(3), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.02.001
Deliens, G., Papastamou, F., Ruytenbeek, N., Geelhand, P., & Kissine, M. (2018). Selective pragmatic impairment in autism spectrum disorder: indirect requests versus irony. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(9), 2938–2952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3561-6
Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1999). Obligatory processing of literal and nonliteral meanings in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1579–1599. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00005-3
Duchêne May-Carle, A. (2000). La gestion de l’implicite : théorie et évaluation. Ortho Edition.
Ebel, R. L. (1965). Confidence weighting and test reliability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 2(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1965.tb00390.x
Ferré, P., Lamelin, F., Côté, H., Ska, B., & Joanette, Y. (2011). Protocole MEC-P : protocole Montréal d’Évaluation de la Communication version de Poche. Ortho Édition.
Gibbs, R. W. (1986). On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.3
Gibbs, R. W. (2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2000.9678862
Giora, R. (2002). Literal vs. figurative language: different or equal? Journal of Pragmatics, 34(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00045-5
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. Dans P. Cole & J. Morgan (dir.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (p. 41–58). Academic Press.
Hewetson, R., Cornwell, P., & Shum, D. (2018). Social participation following right hemisphere stroke: influence of a cognitive-communication disorder. Aphasiology, 32(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2017.1315045
Holtgraves, T. (1994). Communication in context: effects of speaker status on the comprehension of indirect requests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1205–1218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1205
Joanette, Y., Deleuze, A., Ferré, P., & Ansaldo, A. I. (2021). i-MEL fr - Protocole informatisé Montréal d’Évaluation du Langage - Version francophone (version 1.0) [application mobile]. Evalorix. https://apps.apple.com/fr/app/i-mel-fr/id1453181362
Joanette, Y., Ska, B., & Côté, H. (2004). MEC : protocole Montréal d’évaluation de la communication. Ortho Edition.
Katz, A. N., Blasko, D. G., & Kazmerski, V. A. (2004). Saying what you don’t mean: social influences on sarcastic language processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(5), 186–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00304.x
Kelly, M., McDonald, S., & Frith, M. H. J. (2017). A survey of clinicians working in brain injury rehabilitation: are social cognition impairments on the radar? Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 32(4), E55–E65. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000269
Kim, J., & Lantolf, J. P. (2018). Developing conceptual understanding of sarcasm in L2 English through explicit instruction. Language Teaching Research, 22(2), 208–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816675521
Lundgren, K., & Brownell, H. (2016). Figurative language deficits associated with right hemisphere disorder. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 1(2), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1044/persp1.sig2.66
Macoir, J., Fossard, M., Lefebvre, L., Monetta, L., Renard, A., Tran, T. M., & Wilson, M. A. (2017). Detection test for language impairments in adults and the aged—a new screening test for language impairment associated with neurodegenerative diseases: validation and normative data. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias, 32(7), 382–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317517715905
Martin, I., & McDonald, S. (2003). Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders. Brain and Language, 85(3), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00070-1
Martin, I., & McDonald, S. (2005). Evaluating the causes of impaired irony comprehension following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 19(8), 712–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030500172203
Martín-Rodríguez, J. F., & León-Carrión, J. (2010). Theory of mind deficits in patients with acquired brain injury: a quantitative review. Neuropsychologia, 48(5), 1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.009
Monetta, L., & Joanette, Y. (2003). Specificity of the right hemisphere’s contribution to verbal communication: the cognitive resources hypothesis. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 11(4), 203–212.
Moreira-Gendreau, A. (2016). ÉLÉA. Batterie d’Évaluation du Langage Élaboré de l’Adulte cérébrolésé 20 à 60 ans. Éditions Palacios.
Morrow, E. L., Turkstra, L. S., & Duff, M. C. (2021). Confidence and training of speech-language pathologists in cognitive-communication disorders: time to rethink graduate education models? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30(2S), 986–992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00073
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
Nespoulous, J.-L., Lecours, A.-R., Lafond, D., Lemay, A., Puel, M., Joanette, Y., Cot, F., & Rascol, A. (1992). Protocole Montréal-Toulouse d’examen linguistique de l’aphasie MT-86. Module Standard Initial : M1β (2e éd. R. Béland & F. Giroux, dir.). Ortho-Édition.
Pell, M. D., Monetta, L., Caballero, J. A., & Coulombe, V. (2021). Parkinson’s Disease. Dans L. Cummings (dir.), Handbook of pragmatic language disorders (p. 381–415). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74985-9_15
Pexman, P. M., & Olineck, K. M. (2002). Understanding irony: how do stereotypes cue speaker intent? Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(3), 245–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X02021003003
Ramsey, A., & Blake, M. L. (2020). Speech-language pathology practices for adults with right hemisphere stroke: what are we missing? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(2), 741–759. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00082
Rivière, E., & Champagne-Lavau, M. (2020). Which contextual and sociocultural information predict irony perception? Discourse Processes, 57(3), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2019.1637204
Roberts, A., Savundranayagam, M., & Orange, J. B. (2021). Dementia of the Alzheimer type. Dans L. Cummings (dir.), Handbook of pragmatic language disorders (p. 359–380). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74985-9_14
Rousseaux, M., & Dei Cas, P. (2012). TLE : Test de Langage Elaboré pour adultes. Ortho Edition.
Sainson, C. (2022). Pragmatique dans les troubles cognitifs et communicationnels. Dans C. Sainson, C. Bolloré, & J. Trauchessec (dir.), Neurologie et orthophonie. Tome 1 : théorie et évaluation des troubles acquis de l’adulte (p. 158–180). De Boeck.
Saldert, C. (2017). Pragmatic assessment and intervention in adults. Dans L. Cummings (dir.), Research in clinical pragmatics. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology (vol 11, p. 527–558). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47489-2_20
Samson, D. (2012). Neuropsychologie de la théorie de l’esprit chez l’adulte : état de l’art et implications cliniques. Dans P. Allain, G. Aubin, & D. Le Gall (dir.), Cognition sociale et neuropsychologie (p. 47–63). Solal. http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/114256
Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. Dans P. Cole & J. Morgan (dir.), Syntax and Semantics 3: speech acts (p. 59–82). Academic Press.
Searle, J. R., & Latraverse, F. (1979). Le sens littéral. Langue Française, 42, 34–47.
Sohlberg, M. M., MacDonald, S., Byom, L., Iwashita, H., Lemoncello, R., Meulenbroek, P., Ness, B., & O’Neil-Pirozzi, T. M. (2019). Social communication following traumatic brain injury part I: state-of-the-art review of assessment tools. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2019.1583280
Stemmer, B., Giroux, F., & Joanette, Y. (1994). Production and evaluation of requests by right hemisphere brain-damaged individuals. Brain and Language, 47(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1994.1040
Togher, L., Wiseman-Hakes, C., Douglas, J., Stergiou-Kita, M., Ponsford, J., Teasell, R., Bayley, M., & Turkstra, L. S. (2014). INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, Part IV: Cognitive communication. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29(4), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000071
Walsh, I. P., & Jagoe, C. (2021). Psychiatric disorders. Dans L. Cummings (dir.), Handbook of pragmatic language disorders (p. 335–358). Springer Nature.
Whalen, J. M., Pexman, P. M., & Gill, A. J. (2009). “Should be fun—not!” Incidence and marking of nonliteral language in e-mail. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09335253
Whalen, J. M., Pexman, P. M., Gill, A. J., & Nowson, S. (2013). Verbal irony use in personal blogs. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(6), 560–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2011.630418
Yang, F. G., Fuller, J., Khodaparast, N., & Krawczyk, D. C. (2010). Figurative language processing after traumatic brain injury in adults: a preliminary study. Neuropsychologia, 48(7), 1923–1929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.011
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Natacha Cordonier, Maud Champagne-Lavau, Marion Fossard
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
